National Bureau of Investigation

Browse over 8988 requests from this government agency

Go Back
  • REQUEST SUBMITTED

    You have submitted an FOI request

    Date: 2023-06-26 16:04:12.532641

  • PROCESSING REQUEST

    Your request is already in review

    Date: 2023-07-07 16:08:36.838115

  • REQUEST DENIED

    Your request was denied

    Date: 2023-07-13 15:47:50.642706

  • 4

    RATE YOUR REQUEST

    How was your request?

Case Update on Acts of Lasciviousness Against Dr. Aster Peralta Ramos

Requested from NBI by L. Talip at 04:04 PM on Jun 26, 2023.
Purpose: for case update, status follow up, and other legal purpose
Date of Coverage: 03/07/2022 - 03/07/2023
Tracking no: #NBI-892258948788

Talip 04:04 PM, Jun 26, 2023

Sometime in March 7, 2022 an incident of molestation happened in Ospital ng Makati charging Dr. Aster Peralta Ramos by his patient name "Vergel" allegedly done while doing an ultrasound exam as requirement for the patient surgery. In an interview by media, Atty Jun Dongallo, as Regional Director of NBI NCR, stated that a case of Acts of Lasciviousness will be filed. Hence, this FOI request to check on the status of the case if one was filed, or if not, what happened to the investigation conducted by the NBI.

Suarez 04:08 PM, Jul 07, 2023

July 7, 2023

Dear Licinio Angel,

Thank you for your request dated Jun 26, 2023 under Executive Order No. 2 (s. 2016) on Freedom of Information in the Executive Branch, for Case Update on Acts of Lasciviousness Against Dr. Aster Peralta Ramos.

We received your request on Jun 26, 2023 and will respond on or before Jul 17, 2023 04:04:12 PM, in accordance with the Executive Order's implementing rules and regulations.

Should you have any questions regarding your request, kindly contact me using the reply function on the eFOI portal at https://www.foi.gov.ph/requests/aglzfmVmb2ktcGhyHQsSB0NvbnRlbnQiEE5CSS04OTIyNTg5NDg3ODgM, for request with ticket number #NBI-892258948788.

Thank you.


Respectfully,
FOI Officer

Please be advised that details regarding the matter are available in open sources. (https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/metro/841173/doctor-facing-charges-after-allegedly-molesting-patient/story/).

However, for the specifics, the NBI, as the national clearing house of all criminal and other records and information, cannot release any official and/or internal documents pursuant to limitations prescribed by law, rules, and regulations to the right of access to information, viz-

For the guidance of all government offices and instrumentalities covered by EO No. 2 S, 2016 and the general public, the following are the exceptions to the right to access to information, as recognized by the Constitution, existing laws, and jurisprudence:

xxx			xxx			xxx

3. Information concerning law enforcement and protection of public and personal safety:

a. investigation records compiled for law enforcement purposes of information which if written would be contained in such records, but only to the extent that the production of such records or information would- 

iii. disclose the identity of a confidential source and the case of a record compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course or a criminal investigation, or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, confidential information furnished only by the confidential source.


xxx			xxx			xxx

7. Records of proceedings or information from proceedings which, pursuant to law or relevant rules and regulations, are treated as confidential or privileged; 

More importantly, Item No. 6 of the Department of Justice Circular No. 048 dated 04 August 1993, provides that:

“Records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes containing techniques, procedures or guidelines or other classified matters for investigations or prosecutions shall not be made available to the public.” 

This is affirmed in the case of Francisco I. Chavez v. Public Estates Authority and Amari Coastal Bay Development Corporation (G.R. No. 133250, 09 July 2002), which declares:

The right to information, however, does not extend to matters recognized as privileged information under the separation of powers. The right does not also apply to information on military and diplomatic secrets, information affecting national security, and information on investigations of crimes by law enforcement agencies before the prosecution of the accused, which courts have long recognized as confidential. The right may also be subject to other limitations that Congress may impose by law.

This prohibition is further reinforced by this Bureau’s Manual on Freedom of Information, which provides:

“Information, documents or records known by reason of official capacity are deemed confidential, including those submitted or disclosed by entities to government agencies, tribunals, and board of officers, in relation to the performance of their official functions or to inquiries or investigation conducted by them in the exercise of their administrative, regulatory, or quasi-judicial powers.”

Accordingly, the Bureau is bound by the above-cited limitations. Its proceedings are deemed confidential and all information gathered in the course of investigation must be treated with utmost confidentiality and sensitivity. Moreover, the personality and involvement of the requesting party in the said case has not been clearly manifested.

Please be guided accordingly.

Is this request offensive?

Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information.

If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators.