Browse over 9421 requests from this government agency
You have submitted an FOI request
Date: 2023-02-21 12:12:46.977939
Your request is already in review
Date: 2023-02-21 16:15:37.543888
Your request was denied
Date: 2023-03-08 15:59:23.544268
How was your request?
Requested from BIR by J. Arthur at 12:12 PM on
Feb 21, 2023.
Purpose: Research
Date of Coverage: 01/01/2023 - 02/21/2023
Tracking no: #BIR-913032281092
March 8, 2023 Dear John Alexander Arthur, Greetings! Thank you for your request dated Feb 21, 2023 12:12:46 PM under Executive Order No. 2 (s. 2016) on Freedom of Information in the Executive Branch. You ask if requiring employees to contribute in a Defined Contribution Retirement Scheme is lawful. Please be informed that under Section 32(B)(6(a) of the Tax Code, as amended, it is provided that the retirement benefits received by officials and employees of private firms, whether individual or corporate, in accordance with a reasonable private benefit plan maintained by the employer, is exempt from income tax provided, that the retiring official or employee has been in the service of the same employer for at least ten (10) years and is not less than fifty (50) years of age at the time of his retirement: Provided, further, That the benefits granted shall be availed of by an official or employee only once. The term 'reasonable private benefit plan' means a pension, gratuity, stock bonus or profit-sharing plan maintained by an employer for the benefit of some or all of his officials or employees, wherein contributions are made by such employer for the officials or employees, or both. As defined under the law, a retirement benefit may be contributory where the employee pays a portion of the contribution, which the employer deducts from wages while the remainder is paid by the employer. The law therefore recognizes that a retirement benefit plan may be a contributory plan where employees share in the contributions. On the question whether or not it is lawful to require the employee to contribute, presumably against his will, we believe that it can be better addressed by the Department of Labor as it is no longer a tax issue. Thank you. Respectfully, Chief, Legal and Legislative Division Decision Maker FOI Officer
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information.
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators.